Khalistan - A Sikh State?

Is A New Nation in the South Asia's Future?

The idea of an independent Sikh state ("Khalistan" to its modern proponents) dates back to the 1600's. That idea weakens and strengthens, but never seems to go away.

South Asia has a huge number of ethnic and religious minorities and many of them want independence. They want their own country, focused on them as an ethnic group. In the second half of the 20th Century, on of the most notable of those groups are the Sikhs of India's Punjab region.

The Idea of Khalistan

Khalistan is the idea of a political homeland for ethnic Sikhs, proposed by Dr. Jagjit Singh Chauhan (1929-2007) in 1971. If it was ever achieved, it would take up parts of the current India states of Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pardesh, Rajasthan and Uttar Pardesh. Khalistan was envisioned by Dr. Chauhan as a theocracy, a religious state based on Sikh religious principles.

Sikh Political History

While the name "Khalistan" originated with Dr. Chauhan, the idea of an independent Sikh state is not at all new. Gobind Singh (1666-1708 AD) was the last Sikh Guru. He managed to effectively started a Sikh state in 1699 when he created the Sikh Commonwealth (the Khalsa Panth) which Sikhs entered when they undertake a religious ceremony called the Amrit.

An independent Sikh state existed until 1849 on the Indian sub-continent. In Colonial times the capital of the Sikh state was Lahore, which is now in Pakistan. Sikh separatists today seem content to confine their struggle to India. That sometimes leads to allegations that Sikh militants are supported by the Pakistani government.

The political organization of Sikhs into a community separate from neighboring Hindus traces its origins to 1606 when the fifth Sikh Guru, Arjan Dev, was murdered. There are about 25 million Sikhs worldwide. Over 80% of them live in India, and 75% of India's Sikhs live in Punjab. The majority of Sikhs outside India live in America, the United Kingdom, and other former British colonies.

In the 1970s, North India saw growing tension and communal violence between Sikhs and Hindus. Sikh activists began a series of civil disobedience campaigns in 1982. During that time over 100,000 Sikhs were imprisoned. These campaigns brought international embarrassment to the Indira Ghandi's Indian government and greatly overloaded the nation's prison system.

In response to the Sikh problem, Indira Ghandi's government implemented Operation Blue Star in 1984. the operation replaced police and paramilitary forces in the Punjab with regular military forces. The end result was that about 250 Sikh militants barricaded themselves in the Golden Temple (the Sikh religion's holiest shrine) in Amritsar. About 6,000 Indian troops died retaking the temple.

The Future of Khalistan

The idea of Khalistan has did not fade after operation Blue Star. In June of 2001, Dr. Chauhan was allowed to return to India from exile. The Indian government's willingness to tolerate him caused much speculation among human rights organization and political pundits about the future of Khalistan. Chauhan did not advocate armed rebellion as a means of creating the state.

With Dr. Chuahan's death in 2007, the idea of Khalistan may soon become a historical footnote in Sikh history. But the larger idea of an independent Sikh state is unlikely to disappear completely.

Greg Cruey, Greg Cruey

Greg Cruey - Greg Cruey is an educator and journalist. He works as an educational interventionist specializing in a small, rural school in Central ...

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 8+9?

Comments

Dec 16, 2008 8:10 AM
Guest :
Theocracy? Chauhan has said on many occaisiona democracy.
May 23, 2010 12:32 PM
Guest :
India needs to be carved up to prevent the incumbent governement dominated by hindu brahmans from commiting more atrocities -- Torture, fake encounters and killings, rape and murder of men women and children who have nothing to do with any independence movement. Indian government is a cruel government. Just as the mughals and then british power needed to be dissolved, the brahmans power in India needs to be dissolved to bring peace to the subcontinent.
Oct 16, 2010 12:29 AM
Guest :
Yes, a theocracy, because under a true democracy, even non-Sikhs would have the right to vote and hold public offices; but near as I can tell, Khalistanis will never allow that. In one breath they claim Khalistan will be Sarbat da Bhalla and will promote the Sikh concept of equality. In the next they said that Hindus and Muslims will be ruled over benevolently--in other words, they would be 2nd class citizens. That is a theocracy no matter how you cut it. Either that, or the Sikh concept of Equality is no match for the Secular concept of Equality.
May 13, 2011 7:18 PM
Guest :
Its definitely not a theocracy. But I agree that it is not a democracy western style ever. So while it allows free press, freedom from state and religion etc, there are several reasons it is not a democracy.

1) It is a place for a race / religion (actual word is Panth); that is to be run on secular laws, that itself is not a democratic ideal. Democracies are not meant for people of a race, but for people of a place.

2) 50 people in lower and upper house each are too low for a democracy to function. Also, term limits of 4 terms (20 years) are too high and a joke for it to be called a democracy.

3) While yes, non Sikhs would be given a vote, democracies would not have a law that states that any Sikh anywhere in the world can claim citizenship there. I mean can Bill O Reilly claim Irish citizenship because he is Irish descent?
4 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement