Teaching Place Value

Base Ten Blocks Help in Making Abstract Ideas Concrete

17 Comments
Join the Conversation
Base 10 Blocks - Greg Cruey
Base 10 Blocks - Greg Cruey
Base 10 blocks can make abstract ideas like place value and regrouping visible and tangible for your primary school students when the time comes to teach math.

In the struggle to teach math to first and second graders, the real enemy is Piaget's stages of development. The simple truth is that teachers have to find a way to present relatively abstract mathematical ideas to children who haven't yet developed much capacity for abstract thought. The solution is simple: find a way to represent those abstract ideas in a tangible, concrete manner that kids can see and touch. Base 10 blocks are a powerful tool for doing just that.

Overcoming Abstraction

It's no great trick to teach most elementary school kids to count. Many (probably most) can do that when they show up at school. And they certainly know the difference between one cookie and three cookies. Teaching them the names of our ten numerals usually isn't that complex a task, either. But when it comes time to cross the line from single digit numbers to using our numerals to represent more complex values, like eleven or two-fifths, mathematical ideas start to become a little muddier in the first and second grade brain...

In his or her mind a child may ask you, why is 11 worth more than 8, when eight is a bigger number than either of the two "ones" in eleven? It's even bigger than the two ones added together? Does that make sense? And you expect me to believe that 2/5 has less value than 1, even though both 2 and 5 have more value than 1...?

Of course, most first graders can't articulate their objections that clearly. They just know it has suddenly become (for some of them, at least) confusing.

Intro to Base 10 Block

Base 10 blocks (see image 1), like many other math manipulatives, allow children to see and touch the ideas they are being asked to cope with in math class. Base 10 blocks usually come in four sizes. There is the cube which represents a value of 1. The "long" is a block that looks like 10 of the cubes glued together; it represents a value of 10, and the kids can count 10 of the individual cube blocks on a long. The "flat" is a block that looks like 10 of the "longs" glued together; it represents a value of 100, and the kids can count the 10 "longs" on a "flat." Finally, there is the "block" - the size of 10 of the "flats" laid on top of each other. The "block" represents a value of 1,000.

The first time you use base 10 blocks it is a good idea to simply allow the children to examine them and compare them. Discuss them - their sizes and how they relate to each other. Practice counting them in order to allow the children to become comfortable with the fine motor skills required for using the blocks.

Representing Numbers with Blocks

When the children become comfortable with using the blocks, you can begin teaching them to build representations of numbers with the blocks. Many teachers create a place value mat that the kids can lay on their work surface. The mat should have columns that are four to six inches wide and are labeled "ones," "tens," "hundreds," and "thousands." Students learn to always put cubes in the "ones" column, longs in the "tens" column, flats in the "hundreds" column, and blocks in the "thousands" column. After that has been mastered, they are introduced to the basic rule of base 10 counting - you can't have more than nine pieces in any particular column. If you get more than that, you have to go back to the storage bin and trade your ten cubes in for a long, or your ten longs in for a flat...

Children should be allowed to use the blocks regularly. The initial goal is to develop the skill of representing numbers - like 37 (image 2), or even bigger numbers like 1,232 (image 3). Maybe the mats eventually disappear; maybe as a teacher you'll decide you want to keep using them. Once the children have mastered building numbers with their blocks, you're ready to use the base 10 blocks to teach operations - like addition and subtraction.

Greg Cruey, Greg Cruey

Greg Cruey - Greg Cruey is an educator and journalist. He works as an educational interventionist specializing in a small, rural school in Central ...

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 3+0?
17 Comments

Comments

Aug 28, 2008 7:25 AM
Guest :
Image #3 (One Thousand Two Hundred and Thirty-Two) is not accurate. It should say (One Thousand Two Hundred Thirty-Two) the (and) stands for a decimal point.
Aug 28, 2008 4:53 PM
Greg Cruey :
You bring up an interesting point. I spoke to some teachers and I looked at the math lessons on place value in the curriculum that my district uses - the University of Chicago's Everyday Mathematics.

I understand the convention that, when teaching decimals, we try to restrict the use of the word "and" so that it serves only as a verbal representation of the decimal. Everyday Math makes no statement about the convention, but gives an example of a mixed number and says that the "and" in "twelve and three-fourths" represents a decimal. Which is true. But no prohibition is communicated against using "and" in other ways. No "right" method for spelling out numbers is set forth.

My article doesn't deal with decimals.

In natural spoken English, most fluent speakers place the word "and" between the hundreds and the tens place: seven-hundred eighteen thousand, four hundred AND eleven. In the English of the non-mathematical public, it is even permissable to insert the "and" after EVERY hundred: four hunderd AND thirty thousand, nine hundred AND sixteen. Few English speakers leave out the "and" altogether from these numbers.

You're right in that it does violate the convention among math teachers. I violated the convention here because, well, I taught college before I taught grade school and I've never been exposed to the convention. I managed to get certified in middle school math and to teach elementary math for most of my four years in the classroom without ever having had the convention pointed out to me.

The approach to math instruction that Everyday Math promotes is one that acknowledges a variety of ways to represent numbers and multiple approaches to most problems. The hope is that children will THINK about math. Rigid conventions like the one you've described are fading as a result, I think.

In thinking about the issue I came upon the title of a study at the National Institute of Health: A STUDY OF EIGHT HUNDRED AND FIFTY CASES OF SCARLET FEVER WITH A MORE PARTICULAR CONSIDERATION OF SEVENTY-ONE FATAL CASES. Surely they know numbers.

To say that the caption of image #3 is "inaccurate" implies that people don't know what the number means, or that the VALUE of the number is being misrepresented in some way. While it may violate the convention, the caption is not innacurate; no one who looks at the blocks in the picture and then reads the caption will think that there are more than twelve but less than thirteen of the blocks...
Feb 6, 2009 12:22 PM
Guest :
Just because some people say "and" when it should not be said does not make it right for educated people to say it. What kind of research have you done that validates your claim that "most fluent speakers place the word "and" between the hundreds and the tens place"? As educators we must teach our students to do what is correct, not what is common. "And" does not belong between the hundreds and ones place at any time. When writing a check for 102 dollars it is not proper to write "one hundred and two dollars." It would be written "one hundred two dollars." While what you wrote is not inaccurate in your mind, it is misleading and not technically correct. When you publish things you must be technically correct.
Feb 6, 2009 1:42 PM
Greg Cruey :
LOL. Saying "and" or not saying "and" is a matter of right and wrong? Next you will be telling me that I can't end my sentences with prepositions anymore. But I guess that sort of logic is what we're headed towoard. ("But I guess that sort of logic is that toward which we are heading?" Hmm, sounds awkward.) And while ending sentences in prepositions is not permissible in Latin, the Little, Brown Handbook says it's acceptable in English.

As educators we must teach our children to think and understand, not just memorize facts and learn rules. And if I write "one hundred and twelve dollars" or "two hundred and eight dollars & 16/100" on a check, the bank will certainly honor it and they'll pay out the correct amount.

You are looking at convention as a cup that you can fill with values. It is just a convention. No one suffers eternal punishment for violating it, and it carries no mathematical information. No one misunderstands me when I say "one hundred and four dollars" or construes it as anything but $104.00.

What I wrote is not inaccurate PERIOD. It has nothing to do with my mind...
May 13, 2009 6:08 AM
Guest :
As a true speaker of the English language, born and raised in England, I feel I have a reasonable command of my mother tongue; I can assure you there is absolutely nothing wrong in including the word 'and' when stringing a series of figures together. In fact, when we write cheques here in England (and no I haven't mispelled 'cheques' - that is what us English people call them!) we always include the word 'and' when writing the figure down. I am studying to be a primary teacher and found Greg's article about place value most helpful in my studies, given that it is just about that - place value; not a detailed study of written English. Let's all focus on the mathematics, not the nit-picking.
Jun 18, 2009 5:22 AM
Guest :
I agree that using "and" to link numbers together is fine and is mainly used here in England, in fact I had not hear of the other way until now. I think it is personal preference to what is used and either way gets to the same end.
As good maths teachers, we shouldn't be prescriptive in our approach as there are so many ways to teach maths and no one way is right or wrong. We should be differentiating to include all learners.
What this debate does bring out is the fact that the language surrounding maths can be very difficult to comprehend. For example, in and out are very different concepts in English, but when looking at fractions 1 in 4, is the same as 1 out of 4! Bizarre!! This should also be tackled before learners are able to tackle the actual maths.
Sep 13, 2009 4:47 PM
Guest :
I can't believe there's a debate on this issue. It is mathematically incorrect to say "one hundred and thirty seven". Not only is it mathematically incorrect, but it's IGNORANT.
Sep 13, 2009 7:26 PM
Greg Cruey :
Hi September 13th Guest,

I like how EMPHATIC you are. I'm not sure what's inaccurate about it. How are conjunctions represented numerically?

Princeton ( http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=ignorant )gives some basic definitions for the term "ignorant." a.) uneducated in general; lacking knowledge or sophistication b.) uneducated in the fundamentals of a given art or branch of learning, lacking knowledge of a specific field c.) unaware because of a lack of relevant information or knowledge.

If my ignorance rests in the area of definition "a" it would have to involve my level of sophistication, since I have three degrees and 11 years of college. Since I'm certified in math in two states and I've been through a healthy dose of professional development for the Everyday Math series (University of Chicago), I don't see how I could be classed as Ignorant under definition "b." And since I'm perfectly well aware of the "and prohibition" you seem to be advocating as a law of math, I don't fit under definition "c."

Really, this discussion reminds me of the sort of academic arrogance that holds that "ain't" isn't REALLY a word or that there's something wrong with ending sentences with a preposition...
Sep 21, 2009 7:06 AM
Guest :
I like the explanation for the base 10 blocks and how to utilize these manipulatives successfully with a class! That's the reason for the article, and it serves the purpose well. Thank you! (I can't believe the debate on all else... where do people get time to disucss?!? lol)
Sep 24, 2009 1:13 PM
Guest :
I'm afraid that the larger issue here (bigger than whether or not to say "and") is actually about the role of manipulatives in teaching mathematical concepts. Although some students may appear to benefit from learning about place value through base 10 blocks, sadly the learning often fails to transfer to symbolic arithmetic (as evident with buggy subtraction algorithms). I highly suggest reading the literature by Uttal and DeLoache for a perspective on symbols systems and representation.
Sep 29, 2009 1:57 AM
Guest :
I am a preservice teacher in Australia. In Australia we do use the word 'and' between the hundreds and tens place values and are taught it at university (college). In our maths (sorry, Americans probably say math but Australians do not) course we have an American and Australian academic and it becomes very interesting in the mix up of words.
The use of concrete materials to reinforce mathematics concepts is taught heavily to preservice teachers. I think it is fantastic for students. Thank you.
Oct 17, 2009 11:55 PM
Guest :
Hi Greg - been reading your articles with interest. Wonder if you can clarify something?
I am a teaching assistant (trained to work primarily working with dyslexic students) but am doing some 'research'-for professional development not to publish!- into the difficulties encountered by dyslexics when doing maths. I think I've got to the point where I can't see the woods for the trees...I've read Dowker, Cockcroft, Chinn ..the list goes on....but I can't explain in simple lay man's terms or common English (oops, let's not start another debate about English!) why dyslexics (and many others) struggle with place value.
I can see why they have difficulty seeing that 11 is bigger than 5, but why do dyslexic children struggle when adding/subtracting using the column method-for example? I used to think it was purely a question of poor sequential memory but am now totally confused. What is the underlying difficulty? Thanks.
Oct 18, 2009 5:01 PM
Greg Cruey :
A couple of thoughts… Begin by questioning your assumptions. Can you explain what dyslexia is? I have a graduate degree in linguistics and I’m certified in reading; but I can’t define it. It’s a conclusion reached most often through process of elimination. Is it poor eyesight?...no; is it low IQ?...no; is it a hearing problem?... no; is it lack of access to education?...no; and when the one runs out of other choices, a reading problem was determined to be dyslexia. It’s not a technical term. It doesn’t appear in the DSM.

Why does Johnny struggle with place value? He probably has his own individual reasons, whether he’s dyslexic (whatever that means) or not. Neuropsychiatry (using brain imaging) and the genetic sciences are beginning the process of identifying biological and physiological causes for learning disabilities. But that’s a ways off yet. And I’d like to emphasize the plurality of that term – causes.

I don’t believe there is a (one) reason. And since the cause of the problem is usually beyond our ability to identify, the pedagogy that helps overcome the problem is more important. That often varies from individual to individual.
Feb 1, 2010 8:17 PM
Guest :
A note from a parent of four children.

All of my children attended an elementary school that refused to teach math by rote. They used blocks, toys, word problems, and just about everything else they could find under the sun to give their students the opportunity to 'understand' that 2+2=4.

My kids hated it. They were frustrated with the word problems, bored with the blocks, and learned nothing. By grade three they couldn't add, subtract, or multiply.

To counteract the damage we've put our kids in Kumon.

I'm here because my 13 year old was presented with ten base block division of real numbers this week. Again, he hates it, doens't understand it, and thinks its 'stupid'. I told him to give it a chance but after spending an hour on the internet I have to agree with him. This looks like another fad, sucking in teachers by the dozen, and ensuring our children graduate with no math skills at all.

I so much wish for the good old days when school was about the students and not the teachers.
Mar 4, 2010 5:53 PM
Guest :
Feb 1, 2010 Guest,
Maths teaching IS about the kids, not about the teacher. If it was about the teacher we would still be teaching by rote, as was the case in the old days.
I am a pre-service teacher in Australia with a 5 year old myself, and I once thought that the best way to teach her would be to make sure she knew her tables by rote, but teach her everything else in a different way. Now I think differently.
Maths is not about reciting facts and formulas, it is about understanding the relationships between numbers and in doing so developing strategies to help you make connections and calculations. If your children have struggled with learning maths using many forms of manipulatives and word problems, then I would suggest they do not understand the concept of maths.
They may now know that 2+2=4, but do they know what it means? I would even venture to say that their teacher had the right idea in her teaching, but was perhaps left wanting in their ability to teach conceptual maths properly.
We also have Kumon here in Australia and I have found that my students who attend these classes to be very arrogant in terms in their maths knowledge, and unfortunately are incapable of applying their 'knowledge' to real life situations that they may come across.
I am not an advocate of Outcomes Based Education by any means, but I do believe there are better ways to teach our children, across all subjects, they the old style rote learning we experienced as kids.
Sep 22, 2010 8:06 PM
Guest :
cool... my dad says its good...
Feb 13, 2011 1:46 PM
Guest :
I have used these in teaching kindergarten lately, and enjoyed seeing the great article avail.
17 Comments
Advertisement

Related Topics

Advertisement